Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 26
Filter
1.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 18(6): 112-116, Nov.-Dec. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-697739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: development of a new device to be coupled to light-curing units for bonding orthodontic brackets and accessories, and test its efficacy in an in vitro mechanical trial. The inner surface of the device is mirrored and is based on physical concepts of light refraction and reflection. The main advantage of such device is the reduced clinical time needed for bonding and the low possibility of contamination during the process. METHODS: One hundred and twenty specimens were used for testing the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with the device. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was also determined. The sample was divided into 2 groups. In group 1 a halogen light-curing unit was used while in group 2 a led light-curing unit was used. Each group was then subdivided. In subgroups H1 and L1, a conventional light guide rod was used while in subgroups H2 and L2 bonding was performed with the mirrored device coupled to the tip of the guide light rod. RESULTS: The values obtained for the shear bond strength and the ARI in the subgroups were compared. Results showed that there was no statistically significant difference for the shear strength (p > 0.05) and the ARI (p > 0.05) between the subgroups. CONCLUSION: The tests of mechanical trials and the ARI analysis showed that the new device fulfilled the requirements for bonding orthodontic accessories, and that the time for bonding was reduced to half, being necessary only one light exposure.


OBJETIVO: desenvolver uma nova ponteira para ser acoplada aos aparelhos fotopolimerizadores utilizados para colagem de braquetes e acessórios ortodônticos, e testar sua da efetividade em ensaio mecânico in vitro. A ponteira é espelhada na superfície interna e baseia-se em conceitos físicos de refração e reflexão de luz. Apresenta como principal vantagem o menor tempo clínico durante o procedimento de colagem, reduzindo a possibilidade de contaminação durante o processo. MÉTODOS: por meio de ensaio de resistência ao cisalhamento e determinação do índice remanescente de adesivo (IRA), testou-se a ponteira desenvolvida em 120 corpos de prova. A amostra foi dividia em dois grupos. No grupo 1, foi utilizado aparelho fotopolimerizador de fonte de luz halógena e, no grupo 2, fonte de LED. Cada grupo foi subdividido. Nos subgrupos H1 e L1, utilizou-se a ponteira convencional. Nos subgrupos H2 e L2 a colagem foi feita utilizando a ponteira desenvolvida para a polimerização do material de colagem. RESULTADOS: os valores dos testes de cisalhamento e IRA para os subgrupos foram comparados entre si. Os resultados mostraram que não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa para o ensaio de resistência ao cisalhamento (p > 0,05) nem para o IRA (p > 0,05) entre os subgrupos. CONCLUSÃO: os testes de ensaio mecânico, assim como a análise do IRA, mostraram que a nova ponteira desenvolvida cumpriu os requisitos necessários à colagem dos acessórios ortodônticos, e que o tempo de colagem foi reduzido pela metade, sendo necessária uma só incidência.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/instrumentation , Orthodontic Brackets , Adhesiveness , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Materials Testing , Optical Fibers , Resin Cements/chemistry , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Time Factors
2.
Braz. dent. j ; 24(3): 258-262, May-Jun/2013. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-681861

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the temperature variation in the pulp chamber during photoactivation of two restorative composite resins (Filtek P90 silorane-based composite and Heliomolar methacrylate-based composite) with either a quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) or light-emitting diodes (LED) light-curing unit (LCU) and using dentin thicknesses (0.5 and 1.0 mm). Standardized cavities (2x2x2 mm) were prepared in 80 bovine incisors, which were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the photoactivation method and dentin thickness. Filtek P90 and Heliomolar (both in shade A3) were used with their respective adhesive systems (P90 self-etch primer / P90 adhesive bond and Excite adhesive). All experiments were carried out in a controlled environment (37°C). The temperature variations (°C) were recorded using a digital thermometer attached to a K-type thermocouple. The results were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). For composite/dentin thickness interaction, temperature increase was significantly higher in 0.5 mm dentin thickness (40.07°C) compared with 1.0 mm dentin thickness (39.61°C) for Filtek P90. For composite/LCU interaction, the temperature increase was significantly higher for Filtek P90 (39.21°C - QTH and 40.47°C - LED) compared with Heliomolar (38.40°C - QTH and 39.30°C - LED). The silorane-based composite promoted higher temperature increase in the pulp chamber than the methacrylate-based composite.


Este estudo avaliou a variação de temperatura na câmara pulpar durante a fotoativação de duas resinas compostas (Filtek P90 – compósito à base de silorano e Heliomolar – compósito à base de metacrilato) com as unidades foto-ativadoras (UFs) luz de quartzo-tungstênio-halogênio (QTH) ou diodo emissor de luz (LED) e utilizando espessuras de dentina (0,5 e 1,0 mm). Cavidades padronizadas (2×2×2 mm) foram preparadas em 80 incisivos bovinos, as quais foram aleatoriamente divididas em 8 grupos de acordo com os métodos de fotoativação e espessura da dentina. Filtek P90 e Heliomolar (ambos na cor A3) foram utilizadas com seus respectivos sistemas adesivos (Primer P90 auto-condicionante / adesivo P90 e adesivo Excite). Todos os experimentos foram realizados em um ambiente controlado (37°C). As variações de temperatura (°C) foram mensuradas usando um termômetro digital conectado a um termopar tipo-K. Os resultados foram analisados estatisticamente por ANOVA e teste de Tukey (α=0,05). Para interação compósito/espessura de dentina, o aumento da temperatura foi estatisticamente superior para a espessura de dentina de 0,5 mm (40,07°C) quando comparado com a espessura de dentina de 1,0 mm (39,61°C) para a Filtek P90. Para a interação compósito/UFs, o aumento de temperatura foi estatisticamente superior para o Filtek P90 (39,21°C – QTH e 40,47°C – LED) quando comparado ao Heliomolar (38,40°C – QTH e 39,30°C – LED). Compósitos à base de silorano promovem maior aumento da temperatura na câmara pulpar em relação aos compósitos à base de metacrilato.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dentin/ultrastructure , Polyurethanes/chemistry , Silorane Resins/chemistry , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Body Temperature/physiology , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Dental Pulp Cavity/physiology , Hot Temperature , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/instrumentation , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Polymerization , Random Allocation , Thermometers
3.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-141222

ABSTRACT

Context: The result of the studies concerning the bonding of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin is controversial. Aims: To assess in vitro shear bond strength (SBS) of three self-adhesive dual-cured resin cements to dentin compared to a currently used dual-cured resin cement, using SBS test. Settings and Design: The extant study is an experimental in vitro one on extracted human third molars dentin. Material and Methods: 40 intact human third molars were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups of 10. Buccal dentin surfaces were exposed perpendicular to the long axis and prepared with SiC papers. A translucent plastic ring, was placed over the dentin surfaces. Group I (Control group): After 15 s of etching and application of Excite DSC Bond (Ex), Variolink II (Var II) resin cement was injected into the plastic ring and was light cured for 40 s. Group II: RelyX Unicem (RX) was injected into the plastic ring and after 30 s, was light cured for 40 s. Group III: Maxcem (Mc) was injected into the plastic ring and after 30 s, was light cured for 40 s. Group IV: Multilink Sprint (MS) was injected into the plastic ring and after 30 s, was light cured for 40 s. After thermal cycling, SBS were measured with a universal testing machine. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical computations were conducted according to Student's t-test. Results: The mean SBS and standard deviations (in parentheses) for groups I, II, III, and IV were 12.95 (2.64), 6.73 (0.79), 3.01 (0.90), 4.60 (0.75) MPa, respectively. Statistical analysis, revealed that: (1) the mean SBS of Var II were significantly higher than the other groups (P<0.05). (2) The mean SBS of Mc and MS were significantly lower than RX (P<0.05). (3) The mean SBS of Mc and MS did not show significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusion: Bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements was significantly lower than the conventional total-etch resin cement. RX significantly performed better SBS than Mc and MS to dentin.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Carbon Compounds, Inorganic/chemistry , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Bonding , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Dentin/ultrastructure , Humans , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Molar, Third , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Self-Curing of Dental Resins , Shear Strength , Silicon Compounds/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Temperature , Time Factors , Water/chemistry , Young Adult
4.
Braz. dent. j ; 23(4): 362-366, 2012. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-658011

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the bond strength of a resin cement to intraradicular dentin varying the light-curing unit and the moment at which the light was applied. Post spaces of endodontically treated canines were prepared. The roots were distributed into 6 groups (n=10) according to the light-curing unit and the moment of light exposure: I) Quartz tungsten halogen-600 mW/cm² (QTH) + immediate light activation (t0); II) QTH + light activation after 10 min (t10); III) Light-emitting diodes (LED)-800 mW/cm² (LED-800)+ t0; IV) LED-800 + t10; V) LED-1,500 mW/cm² (LED-1500)+ t0; VI) LED-1500 + t10. After post cementation, slices from coronal, middle and apical post/root regions were submitted to the push-out test and failure evaluation. It was verified that LED-800 (4.40 ± 3.00 MPa) and LED-1500 (4.67 ± 3.04 MPa) provided bond strength statistically superior to QTH (3.13 ± 1.76 MPa) (p<0.05), and did not differ from each other (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between t0 and t10 (p>0.05). Coronal post/root region (4.75 ± 3.10 MPa) presented significantly higher bond strength than the apical (3.32 ± 2.30 MPa) (p<0.05) and middle regions (4.14 ± 2.99 MPa) showed intermediate values. Adhesive failures were predominant when using QTH. Adhesive and mixed failures occurred more frequently in the apical region. Higher adhesion of the resin cement to intraradicular dentin was observed in the coronal region with LED light-activation, regardless of the moment of light exposure.


O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resistência de união do cimento resinoso à dentina intrarradicular em função da fonte fotoativadora e do momento de aplicação da luz. Os espaços para cimentação dos pinos foram preparados em caninos tratados endodonticamente. As raízes foram distribuídas em seis grupos (n = 10) de acordo com a fonte fotoativadora e momento de exposição à luz: I) Luz halógena (LH) com densidade de potência 600 mW/cm² + fotoativação imediata (t0); II) LH + fotoativação após 10 min (t10); III) LED com densidade de potência 800 mW/cm² (LED-800)+ t0; IV) LED-800 + t10; V) LED com densidade de potência 1.500 mW/cm² (LED-1500)+ t0; VI) LED-1500 + t10. Após a cimentação dos pinos, slicesdas regiões cervical, média e apical foram submetidos ao teste de push-out e avaliação das falhas. Verificou-se que LED-800 (4,40 ± 3,00 MPa) e LED-1500 (4,67 ± 3,04 MPa) proporcionaram resistência de união estatisticamente superior à LH (3,13 ± 1,76 MPa) (p<0,05), e não diferiram entre si (p>0,05).Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante da resistência de união entre t0 e t10 (p>0,05). A região cervical (4,75 ± 3,10 MPa) apresentou maiores valores de resistência de união que a apical (3,32 ± 2,30 MPa) (p<0,05) e a região média (4,14 ± 2,60 MPa) mostrou valores intermediários. Falhas adesivas foram predominantes no grupo LH, independentemente da região pino/canal. A parte apical apresentou predomínio de falhas adesivas e mistas. Concluiu-se que a resistência de união do cimento resinoso à dentina intrarradicular foi maior no terço cervical,com fotoativação com LED, independente do momentode exposição à luz.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Bonding , Dentin/ultrastructure , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Resin Cements/chemistry , Adhesiveness , Cementation/methods , Composite Resins/chemistry , Cuspid/ultrastructure , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Pulp Cavity/ultrastructure , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Glass/chemistry , Humidity , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/instrumentation , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Post and Core Technique/instrumentation , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Stress, Mechanical , Temperature , Time Factors , Tooth Apex/ultrastructure , Tooth, Nonvital/therapy
5.
Braz. dent. j ; 23(4): 399-402, 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-658017

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate in vivo the failure rate of metallic brackets bonded with two orthodontic composites. Nineteen patients with ages ranging from 10.5 to 38.7 years needing corrective orthodontic treatment were selected for study. The enamel surfaces from second premolars to second premolars were treated with Transbond Plus-Self Etching Primer (3M Unitek). Next, 380 orthodontic brackets were bonded on maxillary and mandibular teeth, as follows: 190 with Transbond XT composite (3M Unitek) (control) and 190 with Transbond Plus Color Change (3M Unitek) (experimental) in contralateral quadrants. The bonded brackets were light cured for 40 s, and initial alignment archwires were inserted. Bond failure rates were recorded over a six-month period. At the end of the evaluation, six bond failures occurred, three for each composite. Kaplan-Meyer method and log-rank test (Mantel-Cox) was used for statistical analysis, and no statistically significant difference was found between the materials (p=0.999). Both Transbond XT and Transbond Plus Color Change composites had low debonding rates over the study period.


O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar in vivo a taxa de falha de braquetes metálicos colados com dois compósitos ortodônticos. Dezenove pacientes com idades entre 10,5 e 38,7 anos, que necessitavam de tratamento ortodôntico corretivo, foram selecionados para estudo. As superfícies de esmalte de segundos pré-molares a segundos pré-molares foram tratadas com Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer (3M Unitek). Em seguida, 380 bráquetes foram colados nos dentes superiores e inferiores, como segue: 190 com compósito Transbond XT (3M Unitek) (controle) e 190 com Transbond Plus Color Change (3M Unitek) (experimental), em quadrantes contralaterais. Os bráquetes colados foram fotopolimerizados por 40 s e arcos de alinhamento inicial foram inseridos. As taxas de insucesso na adesão foram registrados durante um período de seis meses. No final da avaliação, seis falhas de adesão ocorreram, três para cada composto. Para a análise estatística foram utilizados os testes de Kaplan-Meyer e log-rank (Mantel-Cox), e não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os materiais (p=0,999). Ambos compósitos, Transbond XT e Transbond Plus Color Change, tiveram baixas taxas de descolagem durante o período de estudo.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Resin Cements/chemistry , Bicuspid/ultrastructure , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Equipment Failure , Follow-Up Studies , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/instrumentation , Mandible , Maxilla , Orthodontic Wires , Time Factors
6.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-140139

ABSTRACT

Aims: The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the influence of different light curing units on the conversion of four composite resins with different compositions (Durafill VS® - Heraeus-Kulzer, Tetric Ceram® - Ivoclar/Vivadent, Filtek™ Supreme XT - 3M ESPE™ e Aelite™ LS Packable - Bisco), using differential scanning calorimetry. Materials and Methods: A stainless steel matrix was used to prepare 48 cylindrical composite test samples (n=6), measuring 3 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness. The samples were photoactivated using a halogen lamp (Optilux™ 500 - Demetron/Kerr) and three different generations of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (LEC-470 I - MMOptics, Radii Plus - SDI and Ultra-Lume™ LED 5 - Ultradent). After removal of the matrix, each sample was weighed and hermetically sealed in an aluminum pan and analyzed. The amount of heat liberated by thermopolymerisation of residual monomers after photoactivation was measured in Joules/gram (J/g). The data were submitted to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test (P ≤ 0.002) and the Tukey test (P < 0.05). Results: The Ultra-Lume™ LED 5 was superior on degree of conversion for all resins. The Radii Plus was equal to the Ultra-Lume™ LED 5, except for the resin Tetric Ceram® , were the Optilux™ 500 was superior. The LEC-470 I was inferior for the conversion of all resins. Conclusion: The study proves the importance of the compatibility of the different photoinitiators in resin composites with the different light sources.


Subject(s)
Calorimetry, Differential Scanning , Camphor/analogs & derivatives , Camphor/chemistry , Camphor/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Materials/chemistry , Hot Temperature , Humans , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives , Materials Testing , Phosphines/chemistry , Phosphines/radiation effects , Photoinitiators, Dental/chemistry , Photoinitiators, Dental/radiation effects , Polymerization , Spectrophotometry , Thermogravimetry
7.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-140122

ABSTRACT

Purpose: With the introduction of photosensitive (light-activated) restorative materials in orthodontics, various methods have been suggested to enhance the polymerization of the materials used, including use of more powerful light curing devices. Bond strength is an important property and determines the amount of force delivered and the treatment duration. Many light-cured bonding materials have become popular but it is the need of the hour to determine the bonding agent that is the most efficient and has the desired bond strength. Aim: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of five different orthodontic light cure bonding materials cured with traditional halogen light and low-intensity light-emitting diode (LED) light curing unit. Materials and Methods: 100 human maxillary premolar teeth, extracted for orthodontic purpose, were used to prepare the samples. 100 maxillary stainless steel bicuspid brackets of 0.018 slot of Roth prescription, manufactured by D-tech Company, were bonded to the prepared tooth surfaces of the mounted samples using five different orthodontic bracket bonding light-cured materials, namely, Enlight, Fuji Ortho LC (resin-modified glass ionomer cement), Orthobond LC, Relybond, and Transbond XT. The bond strength was tested on an Instron Universal testing machine (model no. 5582). Results: In Group 1 (halogen group), Enlight showed the highest shear bond strength (16.4 MPa) and Fuji Ortho LC showed the least bond strength (6.59 MPa) (P value 0.000). In Group 2 (LED group), Transbond showed the highest mean shear bond strength (14.6 MPa) and Orthobond LC showed the least mean shear bond strength (6.27 MPa) (P value 0.000). There was no statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength values of all samples cured using either halogen (mean 11.49 MPa) or LED (mean 11.20 MPa), as the P value was 0.713. Conclusion: Polymerization with both halogen and LED resulted in shear bond strength values which were above the clinically acceptable range given by Reynolds. The LED light curing units produced comparable shear bond strength to that of halogen curing units.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Bicuspid , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Humans , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/instrumentation , Materials Testing , Orthodontic Brackets , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Polymerization , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical
8.
Braz. dent. j ; 22(6): 486-489, 2011. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-622722

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effects of thermocycling and different light sources on the bond strength of metallic brackets to bovine tooth enamel using an adhesive resin. Bovine teeth were etched with 35% phosphoric acid gel for 20 s. After application of primer, metallic brackets were bonded to the buccal surface using Transbond XT, forming 8 groups (n=20), depending on the light source used for photoactivation (AccuCure 3000 argon laser - 20 s, Apollo 95E plasma arc - 12 s, UltraLume 5 LED - 40 s and XL2500 halogen light - 40 s) and experimental conditions without (Groups 1 to 4) or with thermocycling (Groups 5 to 8). Shear bond testing was carried out after 24 h of distilled water storage (Groups 1 to 4) or storage and thermocycling in distilled water (groups 5 to 8; 1,500 cycles - 5o/55oC). Data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was evaluated at ×8 magnification. No significant differences (p>0.05) in bond strength were found when the conditions without and with thermocycling were compared for any of the light sources. No significant differences (p>0.05) in bond strength were found among the light sources, irrespective of performing or not thermocycling. There was a predominance of ARI scores 1 in all groups. In conclusion, light sources and thermocycling had no influence on the bond strength of brackets to bovine enamel.


Este estudo avaliou o efeito da termociclagem e diferentes fontes de luz na resistência de união de bráquetes metálicos ao esmalte bovino utilizando uma resina adesiva. Dentes bovinos foram condicionados com ácido fosfórico 35% por 20 s. Após aplicação do primer, bráquetes metálicos foram colados na superfície bucal usando Transbond XT, formando 8 grupos (n=20), dependendo das fontes de luz usadas para fotoativação (AccuCure 3000 argon laser - 20 s, Apollo 95E plasma arc - 12 s, UltraLume 5 LED - 40 s e XL2500 halogen light - 40 s) nas condições experimentais sem (Grupos 1 a 4) ou com termociclagem (Grupos 5 a 8). O teste de resistência de união foi realizado após 24 h armazenados em água destilada (Grupos 1 a 4) ou armazenados e termociclados em água destilada (Grupos 5 a 8;1500 ciclos - 5o/55oC). Os dados foram submetidos à Análise de Variância de duas vias e ao teste de Tukey (p<0,05). O Índice Remanescente do Adesivo (IRA) foi avaliado em aumento de 8 vezes. Nenhuma diferença significante (p>0,05) na resistência de união foi encontrada quando as condições, sem ou com termociclagem foi comparado, para qualquer das fontes de luz. Nenhuma diferença significante (p>0,05) na resistência de união foi encontrada entre as fontes de luz, independente de realizar ou não a termociclagem. O IRA mostrou predominância de escore 1 em todos os grupos. Em conclusão, as fontes de luz e a termociclagem não influenciaram na resistência de união do bráquete ao esmalte bovino.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Bonding , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Orthodontic Brackets , Adhesiveness , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Light , Materials Testing , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Temperature , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
9.
Braz. dent. j ; 22(3): 245-248, 2011. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-595648

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the bond strength of brackets to ceramic testing different etching times and light sources for photo-activation of the bonding agent. Cylinders of feldspathic ceramic were etched with 10 percent hydrofluoric acid for 20 or 60 s. After application of silane on the ceramic surface, metallic brackets were bonded to the cylinders using Transbond XT (3M Unitek). The specimens for each etching time were assigned to 4 groups (n=15), according to the light source: XL2500 halogen light, UltraLume 5 LED, AccuCure 3000 argon laser, and Apollo 95E plasma arc. Light-activation was carried out with total exposure times of 40, 40, 20 and 12 s, respectively. Shear strength testing was carried out after 24 h. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was evaluated under magnification. Data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Specimens etched for 20 s presented significantly lower bond strength (p<0.05) compared with those etched for 60 s. No significant differences (p>0.05) were detected among the light sources. The ARI showed a predominance of scores 0 in all groups, with an increase in scores 1, 2 and 3 for the 60 s time. In conclusion, only the etching time had significant influence on the bond strength of brackets to ceramic.


Este estudo avaliou a resistência de união de bráquetes à cerâmica testando diferentes tempos de condicionamento e fontes de luz para fotoativação do agente de união. Cilindros de cerâmica feldspática foram condicionados com ácido fluorídrico 10 por cento por 20 ou 60 s. Após aplicação de silano na superfície da cerâmica, bráquetes metálicos foram colados aos cilindros utilizando Transbond XT (3M Unitek). Os espécimes de cada tempo de condicionamento foram divididos em 4 grupos (n=15): fonte halógena XL2500, LED UltraLume 5, laser de argônio AccuCure 3000 e arco de plasma Apollo 95E. A fotoativação foi realizada com tempo total de 40, 40, 20 e 12 s, respectivamente. O teste de cisalhamento foi realizado após 24 h. O índice de adesivo remanescente (IAR) foi avaliado sob aumento. Os dados foram submetidos a ANOVA de duas vias e teste de Tukey (p<0,05). Espécimes condicionados por 20 s apresentaram resistência de união significativamente menor que espécimes condicionados por 60 s. Não foram detectadas diferenças significativas entre as fontes de luz. O IAR mostrou predominância de escores 0 para todos os grupos, com aumento nos escores 1, 2 e 3 para o tempo 60 s. Em conclusão, apenas o tempo de condicionamento teve influência significativa na resistência de união de bráquetes à cerâmica.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Bonding , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Dental Etching/methods , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Adhesiveness , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Hydrofluoric Acid/chemistry , Materials Testing , Photochemical Processes , Polymerization , Potassium Compounds/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Silanes/chemistry , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Time Factors , Tooth/anatomy & histology
10.
Braz. dent. j ; 22(3): 249-253, 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-595649

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of different light-emitting diodes (LED) light-curing devices for bonding orthodontic brackets, using the shear bond strength and analysis of adhesive remnant index (ARI). Crowns from 60 bovine incisors received brackets bonded with Transbond XT. Specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=15) according to the light-curing procedures: HL = control, halogen light; OR = Ortholux LED; UL = Ultraled XP, and RD = Radii LED. All light-curing procedures were performed for 40 s. Shear bond strength test was evaluated using an universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test. The ARI scores were evaluated with a stereoscopic magnifying glass and analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis test. A significance level of 5 percent was set for all analyses. Shear bond strength means in MPa and standard deviations were 9.82 (3.28), 12.70 (3.35), 9.04 (2.80) and 11.22 (2.36) for HL, OR, UL and RD, respectively. OR presented the highest shear bond strength mean value. HL differed significantly (p<0.05) from Groups OR and RD. However, these groups did not differ significantly from each other (p>0.05). Regarding the ARI scores, no statistically significant difference was observed (p>0.05) among the groups. In conclusion, Ortholux LED and Radii LED units provided the highest values of bracket adhesive strength.


O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência de diferentes aparelhos de luz tipo LED na colagem de bráquetes ortodônticos, através do teste de resistência ao cisalhamento e do Índice de Remanescente do Adesivo (IRA). Coroas de 60 incisivos bovinos receberam a colagem de bráquetes com compósito Transbond XT. A amostra foi dividida em 4 grupos (n=15) de acordo com os seguintes tipos de fotoativação: HL: controle, luz halógena; OR= Ortholux LED; UL= Ultraled XP e RD= Radii LED. Todas as fotoativações foram realizadas por 40 s. O teste de resistência ao cisalhamento foi realizado em máquina universal de ensaios mecânicos à velocidade de 0,5 mm/min. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente pelo ANOVA e teste de Tukey. Os escores do IRA foram avaliados em lupa estereoscópica e analisados estatisticamente pelo teste de Kruskal-Wallis. O nível de significância de 5 por cento foi adotado para todas as análises. Os valores médios (MPa) e o desvio-padrão do teste de resistência ao cisalhamento foram 9,82 (3,28), 12,70 (3,35), 9,04 (2,80) e 11,22 (2,36) para o grupo HL, OR, UL e RD, respectivamente. O grupo OR apresentou os maiores valores médios de resistência ao cisalhamento. O grupo HL diferiu significativamente (p<0,05) dos grupos OR e RD. Entretanto, este dois grupos não diferiram estatisticamente entre si (p>0,05). Quanto ao escores do IRA, nenhuma diferença estatística significante foi observada (p>0,05) entre os grupos. Concluiu-se que as unidades de luz Ortholux LED e Radii LED proporcionaram maiores valores de resistência adesiva aos bráquetes.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Bonding , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Adhesiveness , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Dental Enamel/anatomy & histology , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Materials Testing , Photochemical Processes , Polymerization , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Time Factors
11.
J. appl. oral sci ; 18(3): 244-248, May-June 2010. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-557087

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the bond strength of ceramic restorations luted using a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE) under different dentin conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the experimental groups, ceramic restorations were luted to bovine incisors with RelyX Unicem under the following conditions: [Dry dentin]: surface was dried using air stream for 15 s; [Moist dentin]: excess dentin moisture was removed with absorbent paper; [Bonding agent]: Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) self-etching adhesive system was previously applied to dentin. In the Control group, cementation was done using an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Excite DSC) and Variolink II resin cement (Ivoclar Vivadent). Photoactivation of the resin cements was performed with UltraLume LED 5 unit (Ultradent). The restorations (n=5 per group) were sectioned into beams and microtensile testing was carried out. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Failure modes were classifed under Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) (x120 magnifcation). RESULTS: The bond strength was dependent on the moisture status of the dentin. Bond strength in the "dry dentin group" was signifcantly lower than that of all other groups, which showed similar results. A predominance of mixed failures was detected for the control group, while a predominance of adhesive failures was observed for the "bonding agent" and "dry dentin" groups. The "moist dentin" group presented predominantly cohesive failures within the luting material. The previous application of a self-etching adhesive showed no signifcant effect. CONCLUSIONS: Only excess dentin moisture should be removed for the cementation of ceramic restorations with self-adhesive resin cements.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dentin/ultrastructure , Resin Cements/chemistry , Adhesiveness , Air , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Cementation/methods , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Stress Analysis , Desiccation , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Methacrylates/chemistry , Random Allocation , Stress, Mechanical , Temperature , Tensile Strength , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
12.
J. appl. oral sci ; 18(1): 59-67, Jan.-Feb. 2010. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-545028

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different filler sizes and shapes on the surface roughness of experimental resin-composite series. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-three disc-shaped specimens of the series (Spherical-RZD 102, 105, 106, 107, 114 and Irregular-RZD 103, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112) were prepared in a split Teflon mold and irradiated with an halogen light-curing unit (450 mW/cm² for 40 s) at both top and bottom surfaces. The specimens were stored for 3 months in distilled water. The surface roughness values in form of surface finish-vertical parameter (Ra), maximum roughness depth (Rmax) and horizontal roughness parameter (Sm) were recorded using a contact profilometer. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the means were compared by Scheffé post-hoc test (a=0.05). RESULTS: The lowest surface roughness (Ra) was observed in S-100 (0.079±0.013), while the roughest surface was noted in I-450/700/1000 (0.125±0.011) and I-450/1000 (0.124±0.004). The spherical-shape series showed the smoothest surface finish compared to the irregular-shape ones with higher significant difference (p>0.05). The vertical surface roughness parameter (Ra) values increased as the filler size increased yielding a linear relation (r²=0.82). On the contrary, the horizontal parameter (Sm) was not significantly affected by the filler size (r²=0.24) as well as the filler shape. CONCLUSIONS: Filler particle's size and shape have a great effect on the surface roughness parameters of these composite series.


Subject(s)
Humans , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Barium Compounds/chemistry , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Carbon Compounds, Inorganic/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Materials/radiation effects , Dental Polishing/methods , Glass/chemistry , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Nanocomposites/chemistry , Particle Size , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polymethacrylic Acids/chemistry , Polyurethanes/chemistry , Surface Properties , Silanes/chemistry , Silicon Compounds/chemistry , Silicon Dioxide/chemistry , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
13.
J. appl. oral sci ; 18(1): 68-74, Jan.-Feb. 2010. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-545029

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of the light curing units on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two premolars were divided into six groups (n=12): Group I: brackets bonded with Transbond and polymerization with halogen light; Group II: Transbond and LED; Group III: Fuji Ortho and halogen light; Group IV: Fuji Ortho and LED; Group V: Fuji Ortho, without acid and halogen light; Group VI: Fuji Ortho, without acid and LED. The groups were tested to shear strength in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: The composite resin presented higher shear bond strength than the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (p<0.05). The halogen light and LED sources produced similar shear bond strength (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The shear bond strength was influenced by the material but not by the light-curing unit. The use of LED reduced the experimental time by approximately 60 percent, with the same curing efficiency.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental , Dental Bonding , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Dental Cements/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Acid Etching, Dental , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Polymers/chemistry , Radiation Dosage , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Time Factors
14.
Braz. dent. j ; 21(5): 432-438, 2010. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-568989

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess polymerization ability of three light-curing units by evaluating the influence of the light source, curing regimen and permeant (water or ethanol) on sorption, solubility and amount of residual monomers of a dental adhesive. Specimens of Adper Single Bond 2 were fabricated using a stainless steel circular matrix (8 mm x 1 mm). One quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) lamp and two light-emitting diode (LED) device at three different curing regimes (L1 = 12 J; L2 = 24 J; L3 = 24 J) were used to cure the specimens. Specimens were stored in two types of permeants - deionized water or 75 percent ethanol - for two storage times (G1 =7 days; G2 = 30 days). The specimens underwent water sorption and solubility tests, according to ISO 4049:2000 standard. After storage, residual monomers were identified and quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For sorption, L1 showed the highest values and QTH, the lowest. For solubility, in ethanol-stored groups, L1 had also the highest values, and QTH, the lowest, and findings were significantly different from the other curing regimens. L1 leached significantly more monomers than the others, and QTH had the lowest results. In conclusion, the type of light source, the curing regimen and the permeant affected sorption, solubility and amount of residual monomers of the adhesive under study.


O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a capacidade de polimerização de três unidades fotopolimerizadoras por meio da análise da influência das fontes de luz, regimes de cura (QTH, L1, L2 e L3) e diferentes permeantes (água e etanol) na sorção, solubilidade e quantidade de monômeros residuais de um adesivo dentário. Espécimes de AdperTM Single Bond 2 foram feitos utilizando uma matriz circular de aço inoxidável (8 mm x 1 mm). Três fontes de luz, uma a base de luz halógena (QTH) e duas a base de diodos emissores de luz (LED), em três diferentes regimes de cura (L1 = 12J; L2 = 24J; L3 = 24J) foram usados para fotoativar os espécimes. Os espécimes foram armazenados em dois tipos de permeantes (água deionizada ou etanol a 75 por cento), por dois diferentes períodos de armazenamento (G1 =7 dias; G2 = 30 dias). Os espécimes foram submetidos a testes de sorção e solubilidade de acordo com a ISO 4049:2000. Após o período de armazenamento, os monômeros residuais foram identificados e quantificados por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência (HPLC). Para sorção, L1 apresentou os maiores valores significantes e QTH os menores. Para solubilidade, nos grupos do etanol, L1 apresentou os maiores valores e QTH os menores e os achados foram estatisticamente diferentes dos outros regimes de cura. L1 extraiu significantemente mais monômeros do que os outros regimes e QTH teve os menores resultados. As fontes de luz, os regimes de polimerização e os diferentes permeantes influenciaram na sorção, solubilidade e quantidade de monômeros residuais extraídos do adesivo em estudo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Cements/chemistry , Absorption , Adsorption , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Dental Cements/radiation effects , Ethanol/chemistry , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Polymerization , Solubility , Solvents/chemistry , Temperature , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
15.
Braz. dent. j ; 21(3): 220-224, 2010. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-556821

ABSTRACT

Using the push-out test, this study evaluated the bond strength of the composite resin Z250 (3M/ESPE) photoactivated with the XL2500 (3M/ESPE) quartz-tungsten-halogen light-curing unit with different curing protocols: soft-start (150 mW/cm2 for 2 s (S2), 3 s (S3), 5 s (S5), 10 s (S10) or 15 s (S15), followed by 700 mW/cm2 for 15 s; pulse-delay (150 mW/cm2 for 2 s (P2), 3 s (P3), 5 s (P5), 10 s (P10) or 15 s (P15), with a 1-min delay, followed by 700 mW/cm2 for 15 s. After storage at 37oC ± 1 for 24 h ± 1, the specimens were ground, polished and subjected to a push-out test in a universal test machine (Instron) with a cell load of 500 N at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5 percent significance level. There were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among the groups photoactivated using the soft-start mode. For the pulse-delay mode, P5 promoted the highest bond strength (p<0.05). Groups photoactivated with the pulse-delay mode (except for P2 and P15) presented significantly higher bond strength than those photoactivated with the soft-start. It may be concluded that the influence of initial exposure time was curing method-dependent, with the best results obtained using the pulse-delay method with 5 s in the first photoactivation cycle.


O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resistência de união (push-out) da resina composta Filtek Z250 (3M/ESPE), fotoativada com luz de lâmpada halógena XL2500 (3M/ESPE), utilizando diferentes protocolos de fotoativação: soft-start (150 mW/cm2 por 2 (S2), 3 (S3), 5 (S5), 10 (S10) ou 15 s (S15), seguido por 700 mW/cm2 por 15 s; e pulse-delay (150 mW/cm2 por 2 (P2), 3 (P3), 5 (P5), 10 (P10) ou 15 s (P15), com 1 min de espera, seguido de 700 mW/cm2 por 15 s. As amostras foram armazenadas a 37°C ± 1 por 24 h ± 1, lixadas, polidas e submetidas ao ensaio de resistência de união (push-out) em máquina de ensaio universal (Instron) com velocidade de 0,5 mm/min. Os dados foram submetidos à Análise de Variância e teste de Tukey (5 por cento). Os resultados mostraram que não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos fotoativados pelo método soft-start (p>0,05). Para o método pulse-delay, o grupo P5 apresentou a maior resistência de união, significativamente superior aos outros grupos. Os grupos fotoativados pelo método pulse-delay (exceto P2 e P15) apresentaram resistência de união significativamente superior ao método soft-start. Pode-se concluir que a influência do tempo de exposição inicial foi método-dependente, sendo os melhores resultados apresentados pelo método pulse-delay fotoativado com exposição inicial de 5 s.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Bonding/methods , Analysis of Variance , Dental Stress Analysis , Materials Testing , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surface Properties , Time Factors
16.
J. appl. oral sci ; 17(6): 570-573, Nov.-Dec. 2009. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-534421

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the glass transition temperature (Tg) and degree of conversion (DC) of a light-cured (Fill Magic) versus a chemically cured (Concise) orthodontic composite. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anelastic relaxation spectroscopy was used for the first time to determine the Tg of a dental composite, while the DC was evaluated by infrared spectroscopy. The light-cured composite specimens were irradiated with a commercial LED light-curing unit using different exposure times (40, 90 and 120 s). RESULTS: Fill Magic presented lower Tg than Concise (35-84ºC versus 135ºC), but reached a higher DC. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that Fill Magic has lower Tg than Concise due to its higher organic phase content, and that when this light-cured composite is used to bond orthodontic brackets, a minimum energy density of 7.8 J/cm² is necessary to reach adequate conversion level and obtain satisfactory adhesion.


Subject(s)
Humans , Composite Resins/chemistry , Glass/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Resin Cements/chemistry , Transition Temperature , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Elastic Modulus , Energy Transfer , Friction , Glass/radiation effects , Hot Temperature , Light , Materials Testing , Polymers/chemistry , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Spectrum Analysis , Time Factors
17.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139761

ABSTRACT

Aim: This in vitro study evaluates the influence of marginal sealing methods in composite restorations with different adhesive systems submitted to mechanical load. Materials and Methods: Eighty bovine incisor crowns were embedded in Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) molds with the buccal surface exposed, where cavities (4mm x 4mm x 3mm) were made. Samples had the adhesive systems, Single Bond or Clearfil SE Bond, applied according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The cavities were filled with a Z-250 composite according to the restoration technique (bulk filling or three increments) and photoactivation (conventional, soft start, pulsatile light or light-emitting diode [LED]). The samples were duplicated with epoxy resin for scanning electron microscopy observations. Samples were also submitted to mechanical load (200,000 cycles; 2 Hz) and new replicas were made. Results: The results, in percentages, were submitted to ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (P < 0.05). There was statistical difference between the cycle group (23.84%) and the non cycle group (18.63%). Comparing the restoration technique, there was no statistical difference between bulk filling (19.62%) and three increments (22.84%). There was no statistical difference among the groups: Pulsatile light (24.38%), soft start (22.75%), LED (21.47%) or conventional (16.34%). Furthermore, there were no statistical differences between the adhesive systems: Clearfil SE Bond (21.32%) and Single Bond (20.83%). Conclusions: The photoactivation methods, the restorative techniques and the adhesive systems did not influence gap formation.


Subject(s)
Animals , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Cattle , Composite Resins/chemistry , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Bonding , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Polymers/chemistry , Replica Techniques , Resin Cements/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties
18.
J. appl. oral sci ; 17(5): 446-450, Sept.-Oct. 2009. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-531395

ABSTRACT

The light-curing technique is relevant to reduce the degree of polymerization shrinkage, improving clinical and esthetic success of composite resin restorations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in vitro the effect of four light-curing techniques on depth of cure of a composite resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten specimens of a composite resin were made in cylindrical cavities prepared in PVC plates (3.0 X 7.0 mm) for each light-curing technique. Four photoactivation methods were investigated: stepped, ramped, pulse-delay and traditional. Specimens were longitudinally sectioned and polished for microhardness measurements (kg/mm²), which were made at 0.1, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mm from the irradiated surface. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: The effect of factors studied (curing method and distance from the surface) and the interaction of these factors was statistically significant (p<0.05). The traditional method of cure provided higher microhardness values (69.6 ± 2.5) than the stepped (63.5 ± 3.1) and pulsed (63.9 ± 3.2) methods at all depths evaluated, but it did not differ from the ramped method (66.7± 4.4) at 0.1 and 1.0 mm of depth. CONCLUSION: All techniques employed provided satisfactory cure of the composite resin up to the depth of 2.0 mm from the irradiated surface.


Subject(s)
Humans , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Materials/radiation effects , Hardness , Light , Materials Testing , Polymers/chemistry , Polymers/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Surface Properties , Time Factors
19.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139739

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the influence of quartz tungsten halogen and plasma arc curing (PAC) lights on Knoop hardness and change in polymerization temperature of resin composite. Materials and Methods: Filtek Z250 and Esthet X composites were used in the shade A3. The temperature increase was registered with Type-k thermocouple connected to a digital thermometer (Iopetherm 46). A self-cured polymerized acrylic resin base was built in order to guide the thermocouple and to support the dentin disk of 1.0 mm thickness obtained from bovine tooth. On the acrylic resin base, elastomer mold of 2.0 mm was adapted. The temperature increase was measured after composite light curing. After 24 h, the specimens were submitted to Knoop hardness test (HMV-2000, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (a = 0.05). Results: For both composites, there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in the top surface hardness; however, PAC promoted statistically lower (P < 0.05) Knoop hardness number values in the bottom. The mean temperature increase showed no significant statistical differences (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The standardized radiant exposure showed no influence on the temperature increase of the composite, however, showed significant effect on hardness values.


Subject(s)
Analysis of Variance , Animals , Cattle , Composite Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Curing Lights, Dental/standards , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Materials/radiation effects , Dental Restoration, Permanent/standards , Hardness/radiation effects , Hot Temperature , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Reference Values , Statistics, Nonparametric
20.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139706

ABSTRACT

Background: Class II composite restorations are more frequently being placed with margins apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and margins within the dentin are prone to microleakage. Aims: This in vitro study was used to evaluate the influence of flowable composite and flowable compomer as gingival liner on microleakage in Class II composite restorations and compare a light-emitting diode (LED) unit with a quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) unit for light-activating composite resins. Materials and Methods: Mesioocclusal and distoocclusal Class II cavity preparations were made in 72 sound extracted premolars. The buccolingual width was 2.5 mm and the gingival margins of all the cavities were placed 1.0 mm apical to the CEJ. The boxes were prepared 1.5 mm deep axially, making 144 slot cavities. Teeth were randomly divided into the following two groups (n = 72): (I) Universal Filtek Supreme XT; Universal Filtek Supreme XT + Flwable Filtek XT and Universal Filtek Supreme XT + Dyract Flow and (II) Filtek Z250; Filtek Z250 + Flwable Filtek XT and Filtek Z250 + Dyract Flow. Flowable materials were injected into the gingival floor of the cavity to a thickness of 1.0 mm. Each increment was cured for 20 s. One-half of the subgroups in each group were cured with QTH and the other half with LED light curing units (LCUs). After 1 week of incubation at 37°C, the specimens were thermocycled (5-55°C, x1500), immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine dye for 24 h and sectioned and microleakage was evaluated at the gingival margin by two examiners using a 0-3 score scale. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The groups utilizing flowable liners had significantly less microleakage (P < 0.05). No significant difference was identified between Universal Filtek Supreme XT and Filtek Z250 composites with and without flowable materials. There was no significant between utilizing flowable composite or flowable compomer and between each similar subgroup when polymerized with either the LED or the QTH LCUs. Conclusions: A layer of flowable materials at the gingival floor of Class II composite restorations may be recommended to improve the marginal seal of a restoration.


Subject(s)
Coloring Agents/diagnosis , Compomers/chemistry , Compomers/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Cavity Lining/methods , Dental Cavity Preparation/classification , Dental Leakage/classification , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Materials/radiation effects , Dental Restoration, Permanent/classification , Humans , Materials Testing , Rosaniline Dyes/diagnosis , Temperature , Time Factors , Tooth Cervix/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL